DVD - 2005
Average Rating:
Rate this:
Everything you think you know about modern science is about to unravel in this critically acclaimed film about two young engineers and the consequences they face when they invent a machine that enables them to travel back in time.
Publisher: [United States] : New Line Home Entertainment, [2005]
ISBN: 9780780650466
Characteristics: 1 videodisc (ca. 77 min.) : sd., col. ; 4 3/4 in


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Oct 20, 2017

The basic premise of Primer has the potential to be exceptional, as I admire and respect sci-fi movies based on actual science. I actually viewed this movie a second time, not realizing I had seen it quite some time ago. My reaction both times: it sucked the joy out of watching this movie both times.

The problem, IMHO, is the writing. Again, the basic story line is sound, but the writers fill the script with techno-babble and hip entrepreneur-speak designed to add credibility to overly highbrow dialogue, and so came across as pretentious and superficial. I consider myself to be reasonably intelligent, as I was raised in the education system of the Kennedy Cold War era, with its emphasis on math and science, but I could not honestly discern whether the science portrayed was accurate or even real. Here, the writers drop the ball in failing to make a connection that an ordinary viewer would understand. As they dumped more and more scientific terms and processes into the film, I began to care about the characters less and less.

Then there's the plot. I'm not sure why the two lesser characters of the original foursome were included, as they didn't move the story along and were completely incidental to the film. It this way, they were merely red herrings. Also, what's with the guy with the shotgun showing up to the party? I couldn't understand why that plot device was introduced, other than the writers deciding they needed to add dramatic effect to a movie dry with scientific lingo.

I believe part of the problem is the limited budget this movie must have had. Imagine what this movie could have been in the hands of a James Cameron, Ridley Scott or David Cronenberg. Here's hoping that a big budget remake is a seed in one of their minds.

Sep 13, 2016

Ever wonder what would happen if a couple 4-year olds wrote a movie with cardboard boxes for props? Here you go!
This has it all: Fake science double-talk, gay tension, no budget...basically a long U-Haul ad with no understandable point. The female parts could have been played by mannequins. I don't think anyone who actually studies engineering will be impressed.

Jan 12, 2015

Much more complicated than an ordinary film, even "Inception". Be prepared to watch it a second time before understanding it, and maybe looking at a chart. This means the film isn't for everyone.
It's so complicated because time travel is involved, and the time machine is used as a central plot element, rather than how the scene is set ("We're trapped in <era>! How do we get back to the future?!?"). So, naturally, people try to use time travel against one another.
One thing that makes this film truly outstanding is that the conflict is not due to time travel (return home without causing a paradox) or a villain, but rather the tension of struggling with a new invention, and its moral implications. Highly recommended as a great sci-fi film.

Sep 04, 2013


Apr 08, 2013

Cerebral sci-fi movie that requires more than one viewing to penetrate it's maze of meanings.

laustcawz Feb 12, 2013

If you like "Primer" (which I do), be aware that the man behind it, Shane Carruth, has completed his second feature (the first new one in almost a decade!), "Upstream Color", which is set to be released in April 2013. I, for one, will make sure I don't miss it! 1inthemix--saw "Upstream Color" &...well, I could go into a lengthy review, but I think I'll save that for when "U. C." makes it to DVD. Let's just say that yours was an empty promise. I'm not disappointed, but then, maybe we had different expectations.

elidad Feb 11, 2013

Considering the inexperienced, minuscule crew of five, and the absurdly low budget of $7,000 that it took to make this movie, Primer is quite an impressive feat. It's stylish, has great dialogue (though not typical at all—much of if it's intended more for realism and atmosphere than comprehensiveness), and has a really nice feel. Granted, not everyone will be able to appreciate it, as it is next to impossible to understand the first time you see it (and perhaps the next few times, too, if you're like most people), but confusion is part of the theme, and is part of what makes Primer great. It's designed to be confusing, and this in no way diminishes the beauty of the film as a piece of art and ingenuity.

Oct 28, 2012

If "Inception" confused you than this movie isn't a good choice for you. It's as simple as that.

Jun 03, 2012

This movie raises many questions. For example, How did this get on my list? Why did I waste my time? What the *)*_)( was I thinking of?

Apr 16, 2012

Not for everyone. But personally I loved it. If you enjoy extrapolating on 'what if' questions, the inner workings of science intrigue you, and you happen to like movies like momento or inception that cause you to have to analyze the script and pose questions about reality then you are probably a good candidate to like this movie. You have to be willing to pay attention a lot and still not necessarily get it. I had a friend show it to me who had already done some research on it so he explained some of the more confusing aspects after we watched it. After thinking about it a bit I realized the movie was very well thought out. I'm looking forward to watching it again with other friends. Rubix cube is a good analogy.

PS my girlfriend feel asleep while we were watching it and I can think of at least one other friend who it would have that effect on so I know its not for everyone;)

View All Comments


Add Age Suitability

Jun 05, 2015

ezekieljd thinks this title is suitable for 13 years and over

Jan 12, 2015

conford98 thinks this title is suitable for 13 years and over

elidad Feb 11, 2013

elidad thinks this title is suitable for 13 years and over

Oct 28, 2012

noidont thinks this title is suitable for 13 years and over


Add a Quote

trentalex Jul 21, 2012

"Are you hungry? I haven't eaten since later this afternoon."


Add a Summary

There are no summaries for this title yet.


Add Notices

There are no notices for this title yet.

Explore Further

Browse by Call Number

Subject Headings


Find it at SSFPL

To Top